While principled negotiation is that the ideal negotiation strategy, sometimes you may be faced with a situation during which the opposite party claims to use principled negotiation but during the negotiation will begin using tricky negotiation tactics, which range from using false data to lying. If you discover yourself during this situation, call the opposite party on the prank they’re using, make a counteroffer, keep their interests in mind, and demand on using an objective standard. Although it should seem easier said than done, keep your emotions in check when confronted with dirty tactics. Although it’s attribute to retort sharply, you will say something in your state of anger you may regret later, which is precisely what the opposite party is expecting to happen.
Instead, smile, try and relax, and don’t be intimidated.
After you confront the opposite party about their tricky behavior, continue with the negotiation process. target the people, mutual interests, creative options, and objective standards. If you’re unable to reach a good agreement, evaluate your BATNA and consider walking away.
Nibbling
Let’s say you own a florist and negotiated a contract with a vendor for vases just three days ago. you’re meeting today to sign the printed contract. When the meeting begins, the opposite party says, “I know we agreed to any or all parts of this contract but after I took it to my boss for approval, he told me that the corporate now requires payment in 30 days rather than 45.” When one party wants just a bit bit more toward the tip of the negotiation, this can be called nibbling. Until you confront them and acknowledge the nibbling, they’ll continue to do so.
The key when addressing dirty tricks is to separate the people from the matter. rather than saying, “You tricked me! I’m not visiting negotiate a accommodate you liars,” try “Well, as long as we’re still within the negotiation process, there’s one small thing we’re not that happy about, either. How about us paying you within 30 days of receiving a vase shipment if you may guarantee these prices through the tip of June?”
You could also try, “Look, this agreement has already been approved by a lot of individuals from your side and my side. we’ve got both already agreed that it’s a good contract, and that i would like that we keep it the way it’s.”
Good Guy/Bad Guy
The good guy/bad guy routine, often seen on television shows and in movies about detectives and cops, involves two individuals. The mortal is demanding, abrasive, and difficult while the great guy acts friendly, seems more anxious to create a deal, and appears to be almost embarrassed by the partner’s harsh behavior. the nice guy tries to befriend you while the somebody tries to intimidate you. Although the 2 are working together to deceive you, the nice guy will attempt to determine a deal with you so you’ll be able to avoid having to barter with the mortal.
The best thanks to handle this case is to acknowledge the tactic and call it to their attention. “There seems to be some disagreement between you.
Perhaps the 2 of you would like some minutes to arranged your objectives here today. Why don’t we break for quarter-hour while you’re employed it out?”
Ultimatums
This “take it or leave it” technique is typically designed to intimidate you and find you to sign the agreement quickly. the most effective thanks to handle this technique is to ignore it and continue with the negotiation process as you normally would.
Limited Authority
If you’re within the process of negotiating and also the other party says that they do not have the authority to agree or log out on a difficulty, you’re the victim of the limited authority tactic. Whether this method is preplanned or legitimate, you must say, “I understand. Let’s founded a meeting with the one who does have authority to barter on all the issues.”
Lateness/Long Interruptions
When you are looking forward to someone to indicate up for a gathering which other person arrives either very late or not in the slightest degree, you are feeling flustered. You have been wondering, “Am I on time? Were we imagined to meet earlier today and that i wrote it down incorrectly in my calendar? or even we were alleged to meet tomorrow?”
On other occasions the opposite party arrives on time but is interrupted during the meeting and doesn’t appear to own any interest in resuming the meeting. Consider someone who accepts a telephone call within the middle of a negotiation and remains on the phone for more than half-hour while everyone else within the room waits. These tactics are designed to create the opposite party feel intimidated and irritated. If you find yourself because the victim during this situation, you must say, “You’re obviously very distracted today, and that i wouldn’t want to require advantage of your inattention. Let’s reschedule.” This lets them know that you just will not tolerate this behavior and attacks the matter, not the people.
Statistical Data
The other party should be ready to justify what they’re posing for if they have done their homework. However, listen to the source of their information. simply because the source is legitimate, it doesn’t mean it’s relevant. for instance, imagine you own an advertising agency in Boise, Idaho, and you’re interviewing a recent college graduate for a footing as junior copywriter. once you ask him what type of salary range he’s trying to find, he says he expects $35,000 to $40,000. once you ask him why he thinks he should get paid $35,000 to $40,000, he pulls out a document he printed from the web.
Upon reviewing the document, you realize that the source he’s using bases its results on a national study. Therefore, the results have little bearing on getting employment in Boise since it includes national data rather than local data.
3 Comments