Academy Europe big logo
  • June 15, 2024
  • Last Update May 7, 2023 10:40 am
  • Hannover


There are several elements to a top quality system, and every organization is going to possess a singular system. the foremost important elements of a quality system include participative management, quality system design, customers, purchasing, education and training, statistics, auditing, and technology.

Participative Management

The entire quality process, once started, are going to be an ongoing dynamic part of the organization, similar to the other department like marketing or accounting. it’ll also need the continual focus of management.

The implementation and management of a successful quality system involves many alternative aspects that has got to be addressed on a continuous basis.

Vision and Values. The start line for the management and leadership process is that the formation of a well-defined vision and value statement. This statement are going to be wont to establish the importance of the quality system and build motivation for the changes that require to take place, whether the organization plans to exceed customer expectations, commit to an outlined level of customer satisfaction, or commit to zero defects. the precise sort of the vision and values isn’t as important as the indisputable fact that it’s articulated and known by everyone involved.

This vision and statement goes to be a drive to help mold the culture that’s needed throughout the organization in the drive for quality. it’s not the words of the worth statement that produce quality products and services; it’s the people and processes that determine if there’s visiting be a change in quality. The vision and value are vital statements to line agendas for all other processes accustomed manage the standard system.

Developing the Plan. The plan for the standard system goes to be different for each organization, but there are similar characteristics:

✔ There should be clear and measurable goals.

✔ There are financial resources available for quality.

✔ the standard plan is in line with the organization’s vision and values.

The plan for the standard system may additionally include pilot projects that would entail fixing small quality projects within the organization.

This will allow management to grasp how well the standard system is accepted, learn from mistakes, and have greater confidence in launching an organization-wide quality system. The plan should provide some flexibility for employee empowerment, because, as has been demonstrated, the foremost successful quality systems allow employees at all levels to supply input.

Communication. Change, especially a movement toward higher quality, is challenging to speak effectively, yet the communication process is crucial for the company’s leaders to maneuver the organization forward. Communication is that the vital link between management, employees, consumers, and stakeholders. These communication lines also give birth to a way of camaraderie between all individuals involved and help sustain the drive for the successful completion of long-term quality goals.

Communication systems also must afford employees to administer feedback and supply possible solutions to issues the corporate must face. Management must allow this in both formal and informal ways, like employee feedback slips and feedback roundtable meetings.

The responsibility for fostering a culture that values communication lies with senior management. They alone should make sure that goals and objectives are communicated to all or any. they’re also chargeable for setting up the system for feedback from the workers. Rewards and Acknowledgment. Rewards, compensation, and acknowledgment for achievements in quality are very effective ways to motivate employees. They tell employees at the top of the day exactly what management is trying to accomplish. Rewards, compensation, and acknowledgment may additionally be seen as a type of communication— they are tangible methods that senior management uses to let employees know that quality is very important. this might are available the shape of individual rewards or team rewards. Rewards, compensation, and acknowledgment take many forms, and it’s up to management to make sure that this sort of program is in line with the goals and objectives of the quality system and also the goals and objectives of the organization. Organizations have found that the simplest and most cost-effective reward, compensation, and acknowledgment programs are geared to meeting specific criteria. These programs motivate managers who successively motivate their employees to strive toward predefined goals.

Quality System Design

A quality system consists of the standards and procedures that are developed to make sure that the amount of quality desired is repeated in every unit of a product or service. This portion of the standard system is very concrete and might be measured and managed. Before you begin, your organization should establish a core team to hold the performance system design process forward.

The eight steps of the planning process are:

  1. Understand and map all business structures and processes. This forces employees involved in designing a performance measurement system to think through and understand the complete organization, its competitive position, the environment in which it operates, and its business processes. this can also allow for complete understanding of customer touch points and how the various operations within the organization affect the customer’s perception of quality. See Figure 14.1 for an example of a process map.
  2. Develop business performance priorities. The performance measurement system should support the stakeholders’ requirements
FIGURE 14.1 Service Map Example
FIGURE 14.1 Service Map Example

from the organization’s strategy through to its business processes. This order of priorities must be in situ well before the process enters the particular design phase.

  1. Understand the present performance measurement system. Every organization has some quite measurement system in situ.

For this reason, there are basically two ways to approach the look and implementation of a replacement performance measurement system. Either you’ll scrap the old system and introduce a brand new one as a replacement, otherwise you can redevelop the prevailing system.

Both approaches can work, but the previous approach is more likely to steer to hassle. People will take hold the old measurement system and either use both systems simultaneously or use the old one and easily bear the motions of the new one.

You can eliminate this outcome by taking the second approach.

  1. Develop performance indicators. the foremost important element of a performance measurement system is that the set of performance indicators you’ll use to live your organization’s mance and business processes. this can be the purpose within the design process where the top-down approach meets the bottom-up design approach and where the broad masses of the organization become involved. the aim of this step is to develop the performance measurement system with an appropriate number of relevant and accurate performance indicators.
  2. Decide the way to collect the desired data. Developing perfect performance indicators that may tell you everything you ever wanted to understand about what goes on in your organization is one thing, but having the ability to gather the info required to calculate these performance indicators could be a completely different matter. This issue must initially be addressed during the event of the performance indicators in order that you avoid selecting those that can never actually be measured. There will be trade-offs of cost and time versus the advantages of collecting data, but a probable middle ground between perfect data/high cost and no data/no cost are found.
  3. Design reporting and performance data representation formats.

In this step, you choose how the performance data are presented to the users; how the users should apply the performance data for management, monitoring, and improvement; and who will have access to performance data. After you finish, you should have a performance measurement system that has a solid place in your organization’s overall measurementbased management system.

  1. Test and adjust the performance measurement system. Your first attempt at the performance measurement system will probably not be perfect—there are absolute to be performance indicators that don’t work as intended, conflicting indicators, undesirable behavior, and problems with data availability. This is to be expected. during this step you ought to extensively test the system and adjust the weather that don’t work as planned.
  2. Implement the performance measurement system. Now it’s time to put your system to use. this can be when the system is officially in place and everybody can start using it. This step involves issues such as managing user access, training, and demonstrating the system.

This is not an absolute process that must be followed to the letter so as for it to figure. In some cases, one or more steps is also unnecessary; in others, additional steps could also be needed. It’s up to you to make the mandatory adjustments to the method to maximise the probability of the system’s success.

Designing Part Two of the standard System

This portion of the standard system is conceptual. it’s more about management’s role in increasing motivation and also the determination to form the first part run smoothly. it’s rooted within the communication between management and employees, which was discussed earlier. In most cases, the workers who are performing the activities and process know how to boost the standard. This a part of the system should allow employees to form recommendations and motivate them to need to improve quality.


The inclusion of shoppers during a quality program can take many various avenues, including the value of losing a customer, the customer’s perception of quality, and also the satisfaction level of the customers. The customer portion of a high quality program goes to be unique for each industry and organization, but it must capture how quality plays into the customer’s value system and the way quality drives the acquisition decision.

In service industries, particularly, quality is measured in customer retention rates and therefore the cost of losing a customer. If typical accounting measures could capture the precise cost of losing a customer it would be easy for managers to allocate the precise amount of resources needed to retain customers. consistent with the Harvard Business Review, companies can increase profits by almost 100% by retaining 5 percent more of their customers. Customers over time will generate more profits the longer they stick with the identical company.

Perceived quality by customers results in referrals; in commission industries, referrals can equate to quite 60 percent of latest business.

If a corporation can increase the amount of referrals through increased quality, it’s visiting have a considerable effect on the underside line of the business.


Purchasing is a section in a company where substantial gains in quality are often realized through the implementation of just some policies and procedures designed around quality. Today’s suppliers have to be partners within the quality effort. A company’s products or services are only pretty much as good because the combination of all the inputs.

The first step in molding the purchasing system to collaborate with the complete quality system is to require all the standards developed for all incoming materials which will be qualified as an input to routine process or activity. If the standard system’s performance standards and procedures are completed as described within the design phase these standards should already be established.

The second step is educating the purchasing personnel on how the standards are important to the method flows of the organization.

If standards don’t seem to be upheld, the standard of the merchandise or service will be jeopardized. the staff should even be educated on a way to measure and communicate the desired standards. this could involve materials or statistical process control education, and it could even be as simple as cross-training the purchasing personnel so they know exactly how the inputs fit into the organization. Once the purchasing area knows how the products are used and what problems can arise, they’re going to have a more robust chance of procuring inputs that meet all the specifications.

Once steps one and two are complete it’ll be the purchasing department’s responsibility to speak the wants to suppliers and hold them in control of the standard. This sometimes might not be an easy task and will involve finding new suppliers or working with current suppliers to develop higher quality standards.

Education and Training

The education of employees for the aim of reaching higher quality standards has many alternative facets. as an example, the standard education of management goes to differ than the standard education of the final workforce, because they play different roles in the process.

Because most quality problems start at the highest, so too should education.

The education of management on quality issues should start with a general discussion of quality systems and therefore the roles management plays in quality programs. With reference to cognition, management must understand the history of the standard movement, who the major players were, and the way quality programs have affected the business world. More specifically, managers must know the way quality programs have affected their specific industry within the past, and that they should have a plan of what role quality programs play within the way forward for their industry. Management must also keep up of latest developments in quality. The discussion of the roles that management must play during a quality system is that the most vital aspect of their education. Management must understand how employees view their actions or inactions, how their individual actions and jobs impact quality, and the overall importance of dedication to quality by management. Managers must understand that without strong leadership and reinforcing dedication to quality, a high quality program won’t be meaningful.

The education of employees for a top quality program will include a discussion of how these programs will affect their jobs on a routine.

It should also include a quick overview of quality yet because the tools employees will use so as to make sure outputs and the way their roles add to the general quality goals of the organization.

Data Development and Statistics

Statistical analysis could be a vital aspect of quality systems. It could be considered a cornerstone of the standard improvement process and is extremely closely tied to auditing a top quality system, which is discussed later within the chapter. Statistical process control (SPC) was what

Duran taught as a choice maker in quality systems. Statistical analysis is the measurement portion of quality systems and allows it to be managed. a really common saying in management, which relates well to quality, is “you cannot manage what you can not measure,” and statistical analysis will offer you the measurements necessary to create management decisions.

Statistics was a key tool that Deming accustomed distinguish between systemic and special causes, and also the key to quality management in general was statistical process control. SPC was developed by Walter Shewart while engaging at Bell Labs within the 1930s, and Deming took Shewart’s concept and applied it to quality management. Deming believed that SPC was necessary because variation could be a fact of life in any process. Deming believed that it absolutely was most unlikely that two products/services when produced by the identical procedure and operator would be identical.

Control Charts and Their Role in Quality Systems. Control charts are the foremost widely used tool in quality systems. Control charts communicate lots of knowledge effectively. Figure 14.2 shows a process during which all the outcomes are within the required limits. The upper control limit (UCL) is .18 and also the lower control limit (LCL) is .02, and every one the points fall between these two limits. this suggests the process is on top of things and operating correctly. If a number of the points were to fall outside of the UCL or LCL, it’d signal that the method is not up to the mark and action has to be taken to correct the matter.

We discussed earlier the 2 differing kinds of errors, (1) systematic and (2) special causes. Systematic errors will show au fait a bearing chart united or two points outside of the control limits with the remainder of

FIGURE 14.2 Control Chart

the points within the bounds. Special causes will show au fait a bearing chart with numerous points outside of the control limits.

The exact use of statistical measures goes to show a discrepancy for each organization. Some statistical analysis are very easy to line up and use. for instance, the length or weight of a specific part are often measured and analysis can show if the parts are within the desired specifications. in commission industries the statistical analysis are more abstract, but is simply as valuable. as an example, one could survey customers regularly and ask them on a scale of 1 to 10, “How would you rate the service?”

Here are some common traits of statistical measures utilized in quality systems:

✔ Are driven by the customer.

✔ Reflect vision and values.

✔ Benchmarked to the competition.

✔ Are achievable.


Auditing a top quality management system is simply as important as any other aspect of the system. The audit process allows everyone involved to see if the standard management system is functioning correctly and if the goals and objectives are being reached. Auditing also plays major roles in motivating employees and allows for rewards and acknowledgment measures to be assessed moreover as possible compensation.

Auditing of quality management systems can take many forms, and each organization will have a novel auditing process that matches its system. Service industries will have a awfully different auditing system than a producing organization, but the top results of the systems is going to be the identical. Here are some samples of auditing systems used in service organizations.

Mystery Shoppers. Shoppers are sent to businesses to interact with employees and assess the service quality and report back to management. this is often usually done on a daily basis, and reports are produced for the workers.

Customer Surveys. Customer surveys are now well used as a means to seek out out how your business is viewed by consumers. These surveys can range from mail-in forms to short forms the consumers complete at the time of purchase or perhaps having a saleperson or clerk asking the customer to rate the merchandise or service at the close of the purchase. Getting direct input from your customers is invaluable and should be tired some form in every organization.

New Customer Measures. Measurement over time of the quantity of new customers are often a awfully effective tool to assess quality levels. Customers who are very pleased with your service are visiting tell others—60 percent of recent customers in commission organizations come from referrals. New customers will be a vital litmus test of quality.

Quality in Services. Quality in commission industries has more recently come into the mainstream, and also the benefits reaped by service organizations initiating solid quality management programs have been substantial. the idea for quality management systems in commission organizations is to proactively measure and manage the standard level of the services; a number of the metrics applied because the basis of service quality are:

✔ The “iceberg principle,” in other words, the typical service company never hears from quite 90 percent of consumers who don’t seem to be proud of the amount of service they received. For every legitimate complaint received there’ll be over 20 customers who feel they need had problems, and a minimum of 25 percent of these problems might be considered serious enough to warrant investigation.

✔ Of the purchasers that make a complaint, quite half will do business again if the complaint is addressed and resolved.

If the complaint is resolved quickly, and also the customer feels the organization cares about its customers, the amount will jump up to almost 100%.

✔ If a complaint isn’t resolved, the typical customer will tell quite eight other individuals about the negative experience. If the complaint is resolved, the customer will tell a minimum of five others about the positive experience.

✔ on the average it costs sixfold more to achieve a brand new customer than to stay an existing one.

As you’ll be able to see, quality in commission industries can have substantial influence on the underside line. A well-designed and managed quality system may be the key to providing the standard of service desired.

User Avatar

Related Articles

Leave a Reply